WN:54981:USA01559
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01559
81°
H 81° L 53°
Partly Cloudy | 13MPH

DoJ settles discrimination case against county

April 26, 2012 | 4 comments

The U.S. Justice Department announced Thursday that it reached a consent decree in Deputy Julie Thobaben’s discrimination complaint against the Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department.

Under the terms of the consent decree, the county must promote Thobaben to detective sergeant within three years, increase her current pay rate to that of a detective sergeant, and pay her $141,640 in back pay with interest, attorney’s fees and compensatory damages.

Thobaben, a 17-year veteran with county law enforcement, accused the county of failing to promote her from patrol officer to detective sergeant in March 2006 because she is a woman.

In July 2006, the Wisconsin Equal Rights Division (ERD) began investigating Thobaben’s charges. Based on the ERDD’s findings, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission believed there was sufficient evidence that discrimination had occurred. After an unsuccessful attempt to conciliate the matter, the EEOC referred the case to the Justice Department.

In June 2011, the Justice Department filed its complaint against the county in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

According to the Justice Department’s complaint, the county denied Thobaben a promotion to detective sergeant because she is a woman. Although Thobaben was the most qualified applicant for the position, the county promoted a male patrol officer instead. At the time, the male officer was not eligible for promotion as a result of discipline the county had imposed upon him.

The county argued that it lawfully denied Thobaben’s promotion because its nepotism policy prohibited it from making Thobaben a detective sergeant since she would supervise her husband, Deputy Clint Thobaben, who is a patrol officer.

However, the Justice Department noted that patrol sergeants and not detective sergeants have direct supervision over patrol officers.

The Justice Department also found that the Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department had not applied its nepotism policy to at least eight other male employees who supervise immediate family members.

Under the terms of the consent agreement, the county must also review and amend its discrimination and nepotism policies. The county must also conduct training of its personnel regarding these policies.

"Our uniform, focused enforcement of Title VII, including its prohibition on gender-based discrimination in the employment setting, continues to be a significant priority within our diverse affirmative civil docket. The announcement today of the settlement of the claims by Ms. Thobaben not only ensures that she will be compensated monetarily for past discrimination but that she will be serving the people of Waupaca County as a detective sergeant based upon her merit-based qualifications for that position," said U.S. Attorney James Santelle.

4 Comments for "DoJ settles discrimination case against county"

  1. [quote=Me-in-June-2011]It should be understood that the county was given half a dozen opportunities to correct this situation before the DOJ would have filed suit. To let it get this far (federal court); the county must have thumbed its nose at EEO experts again and again.

    Now the county will see how it's done in the big city.[/quote]
    Guilty on all charges. Now the county is on the line for all of its attorney's fees, and DetSgt Thobaben's legal fees, with interest. These county idiots should have pay it out of their own pockets.

    [quote]The Justice Department also found that the Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department had not applied its nepotism policy to at least eight other male employees who supervise immediate family members.[/quote]
    Next case: class action suit for the rampant nepotism practiced since who knows when.

    -----------

    It's interesting that WNOW can publish the name of the USADA who won the case, but it doesn't find it pertinent to name the [i]good-ole-boy[/i] "county managers" who were responsible for this illegal discrimination.

    If you want read the filed complaint, it's available here:

    [url]http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/emp/documents/waupacacountycomp.pdf[/url]

    lastpercentile Apr 26, 2012 1:25 PM

  2. If the powers that be in Waupaca County were using their personal checking accounts to fight this...would they have? Another complete waste of taxpayer money. Just to fight the inflated egos of some. If male officers are not "man enough" to take orders from a female..they should be fired immediately.

    JustBecause Apr 29, 2012 12:47 PM

  3. Thanks for posting the complaint. Sorry for her that it took so long but she is obviously resiliant.

    Wondern Apr 30, 2012 11:44 AM

  4. Love the comment about seeing how it's done in the "big city"! I have written a comment that the newspaper deems too long in length for this area. I will be sending it in as a letter to the editor.
    Taxpayers....if you only knew the truth!!! (former long-time Sheriff's Dept. Employee)

    Berryp May 03, 2012 3:05 PM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Upcoming Events

TWO SOCKS ON ONE NEEDLE

Location: Waupaca Community Arts Center - Waupaca

Fun in the Son

Location: St. John’s Church - New London

Cat Show

Location: gym, Faith Christian Academy - Wausau

Beer & Bon Bons fundraising event

Location: Lessons From the Art - Iola

Playgroup

Location: B.A.B.E.S. - New London