WN:54981:USA01559
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01559
77°
H 77° L 49°
Cloudy | 7MPH

Fremont woman charged with battery

May 9, 2012 | 18 comments

Angela S. Petrausch, 41, Fremont, was charged with battery to an officer, resisting an officer and disorderly conduct.

Shortly before 9 p.m. Wednesday, April 25, Weyauwega Police Officer Matthew Batte was dispatched to an apartment on Mill Pond Circle in response to a 911 call.

When Batte arrived, he spoke to a man outside the building who said Petrausch was in his friend's apartment, behaving violently. The man said he, his friend and Petrausch had been drinking a bottle of wine when Petrausch started screaming and yelling at them, throwing things around.

According to the criminal complaint, Batte entered the apartment and found that Petrausch had locked herself inside the bathroom. He could hear her screaming and throwing things. He asked her to come out, and Petrausch reportedly responded by kicking the door.

After the tenant persuaded Petrausch to open the door, Batte went in, placed her arm in a blanket hold and took her into the living room where he handcuffed her. When he told Petrausch she was under arrest, she began yelling at the officer, according to the criminal complaint.

Deputy Clint Thobaben arrived at the scene and the two officers escorted Petrausch out of the apartment and to Batte's squad car. As they were descending the stairs, Petrausch reportedly struggled and caused Batte to lose his balance and twist his knee.

After they placed her in the squad car, Petrausch allegedly kicked Thobaben in the leg.

Deputy Bill Zeamer arrived and the three officers were able to place Petrausch in leg restraints. She was then taken to jail.

18 Comments for "Fremont woman charged with battery

"

  1. This reporter only has one point of view . Did it ever accure to you that she locked herself in the bathroom to get away from 2 men that took her home from a bar and took advantage from a already tipsy lady and she was so up set that they didn't even question the men to see why she locked herself in the bathroom presuming the men were so innocent . Well she is drunker then we so we get off more ways then one . The cops will surely arrest her not us and because she was so up set didn't or wasn't able to tell the police what happen and fought them . Before printing a store get all the facts . May be I don't have all the facts but I didnt write it on the front page either . >:(

    molly3164 May 14, 2012 8:19 PM

  2. It's certainly another example of a misdemeanor turning into a felony, only after the police put their hands on a person.

    lastpercentile May 15, 2012 12:58 AM

  3. [quote=molly3164] Did it ever accure to you that she locked herself in the bathroom to get away from 2 men that took her home from a bar and took advantage from a already tipsy lady and she was so up set that they didn't even question the men to see why she locked herself in the bathroom presuming the men were so innocent . T[b]he cops will surely arrest her not us and because she was so up set didn't or wasn't able to tell the police what happen and fought them .[/b] Before printing a store get all the facts . May be I don't have all the facts but I didnt write it on the front page either . >:([/quote]

    Not sure what planet you are from, maybe laws are different there but here you are not allowed to fight with police because you didn't get to tell your side of the story. I would hope that any police response would dictate that they neutralize any immediate threat first. Violent people are seldom rational and often are incapable of following simple instructions. Of course victims are OFTEN arrested as is clearly evident from her CCAP record of numerous arrests...........

    chesteroowi May 15, 2012 12:01 PM

  4. According to this questionable report of what happened, she didn't fight with the officers until she was in handcuffs. If a handcuffed person is an "immediate threat" - somebody didn't pay attention during training.

    It might be interesting to know how many of these "fight with the police" charges occur when the perp is handcuffed. I count 4-5 in the past year.

    Frankly, if a perp committed a felony while wearing my handcuffs, I'd be too embarrassed to charge them.

    lastpercentile May 15, 2012 4:03 PM

  5. [quote=lastpercentile]
    It might be interesting to know how many of these "fight with the police" charges occur when the perp is handcuffed. I count 4-5 in the past year.

    Frankly, if a perp committed a felony while wearing my handcuffs, I'd be too embarrassed to charge them.[/quote]

    Mmmm......once again you make perfect sense. Obviously a person in handcuffs could never bite or spit in your face. If they did, how embarrassing for the officer! And everyone knows that when you "immobilize" the hands, the rest of the body becomes completely absent of any ability to kick at the officers knee, groin or face.

    I certainly wouldn't try to "imply" your overall point but it would appear that if someone is arrested and placed into cuffs, of course they will become irate and become physical with the arresting officer because it is human nature.

    Of those 4 or 5 incidents in which the arrested person "fights" with police in the past year, how many didn't? If that is truly your decision making process on whether to charge someone or not, society is probably better served by the men and women that have sworn to "serve and protect".

    chesteroowi May 15, 2012 5:26 PM

  6. [quote]Obviously a person in handcuffs could never bite or spit in your face.[/quote]
    If the person is being handled properly, no, they should not be able to bite you. Spitting should never have been a felony, and today should never be charged as a felony.

    If it was human nature to attack the police, it wouldn't be a crime.

    So, if 4-5 mishandled arrests are automatically tolerable in this society, let me know how many are "too many" - and I won't bother you until then.

    lastpercentile May 15, 2012 7:26 PM

  7. [quote=lastpercentile] Spitting should never have been a felony, and today should never be charged as a felony.[/quote]

    So you can't get sick from spitting on someone. What a joke, I sure would not want to be a cop when people think this type of behavior is OK.

    FLIP FLOP May 18, 2012 4:01 AM

  8. Percentile,

    While I would never expect you to admit it when you are wrong, have you ever been to a Citizens Academy and Defense class? I'm going to have to say i doubt it if you can't picture in your mind how this would have happened, especially on a stairwell. I would challenge you to restrain someone with cuffs and have them go nuts on you and see how it easy it is to keep control, again, especially on a stairwell. You're hatred of law enforcement has rendered you the inabilty to be objectional.

    independenthinker May 18, 2012 12:19 PM

  9. [quote]So you can't get sick from spitting on someone.[/quote]
    No, you can't get sick if you spit on somebody.

    But, to address the point you were trying to make: with the remote possibility of the common cold, you can't transmit a sickness through spit. Of course, a cold can be transmitted simply during the handcuffing procedure. And when I say transmitted, I mean from the cop to the perp.

    The felony charge originated from a period of time when reactionary legislators thought HIV could be transmitted through saliva. Medical science has since proven that this is NOT possible. The felony of "spitting on an officer" should be rescinded, but law order types like to have it on the books, so it stays. And each time a DA prosecutes the charge, they are only revealing their own ignorance.

    [quote]You're hatred of law enforcement has rendered you the inabilty to be objectional.[/quote]
    You have no evidence of my hatred of law enforcement. You may have developed an understanding that I have a problem with incompetence in law enforcement.

    Your inattention in school has "rendered you the inability" to speak English coherently, and that is [i]objectionable[/i].

    lastpercentile May 18, 2012 3:27 PM

  10. The evidence is most articles that are police related, you have a problem with how it was handled. You decide how it was handled by a news article that places excerpts from an entire police report, in it's article. You, like many, think ou know these people's jobs better than they do. If you have a degree in Criminal Justice, fine, go Monday Morning Quarterback all you want.

    I'm not saying cops are pefect. They make mistakes in their jobs like any one of us do in our jobs. In this case however, it sounds to me like a case of compliant, then quickly turning not compliant. But you read into it how you want.

    independenthinker May 18, 2012 8:27 PM

  11. [quote]I'm not saying cops are pefect. They make mistakes in their jobs like any one of us do in our jobs.[/quote]
    When they make mistakes:

    1) Criminals go free
    2) Innocent people get locked up
    3) Both can get shot
    4) Misdemeanor arrests turn into felony prison sentences
    5) Tax dollars get wasted, and with lawsuits, millions of them at time
    6) etc

    Criminal Justice is an oxymoron.

    lastpercentile May 18, 2012 10:55 PM

  12. I wasn't referring to extreme mistakes that you would be speaking of in #'s 1, 2, 3, and 5, however, even you have to know that cops refer the appropriate charges as part of their jobs and the DA takes it form there. So while Petrausch had the Battery to LE refered, I would bet my bottom dollar it'll be plead down to a disoderly conduct.

    independenthinker May 21, 2012 8:19 AM

  13. [quote]So while Petrausch had the Battery to LE refered, I would bet my bottom dollar it'll be plead down to a disoderly conduct.[/quote]
    So it probably wasn't a felony at all, but it was referred as a felony, so there was at least some hope of a misdemeanor conviction.

    If 90% of my felony referrals were plead down to throwaway misdemeanors, I'd find a new job.

    lastpercentile May 21, 2012 10:45 AM

  14. Actually, when an officer gets hurt in the line of duty, by actions that the suspect committed, it is a felony. The officer can't help what happens in court. Whether you agree with the law or not, it is the law, and she was charged appropriately based on what the article is reporting.

    independenthinker May 23, 2012 8:24 AM

  15. [quote]The officer can't help what happens in court. Whether you agree with the law or not, it is the law[/quote]
    Actually, there is no law that covers plea deals - never has been. It's a complete fabrication by the attorneys involved - including the judges. Like a complicated drug deal, they all conspire to short-sheet the legal system.

    It's not the law. They all agree not to do their job. What do you call that?

    [quote]she was charged appropriately based on what the article is reporting[/quote]
    I didn't say she was charged inappropriately. I said that the entire assault could have been avoided, which means the charges would have been avoided.

    lastpercentile May 23, 2012 1:45 PM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Upcoming Events

Cat Show

Location: gym, Faith Christian Academy - Wausau

Fochs Fun Walk/Run

Location: Scandinavia Village Park Shelter - Scandinavia

Goin’ to the Hop 1950s party

Location: Angelus Retirement Community - Clintonville

New London Heritage Historical Society

Location: Historical Village - New London

Flea Market Faire

Location: Clintonville United Methodist Church - Clintonville