WN:54981:USA01559
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01559
55°
H 57° L 54°
Partly Cloudy | 0MPH

How to really reform American education

April 18, 2012 | 2 comments

I don't understand the recent hostility directed toward teachers unions.

It is said that unions prevent schools from getting rid of "bad" teachers. Who are all these bad teachers anyway?

When I add up all the years my children and I have spent in schools, it amounts to nearly 40 years of education. In all that time, I've encountered maybe two teachers that I believed to be incompetent. Pretty good track record, I'd say.

Without a union, what would prevent a good teacher from being fired because he or she doesn't belong to the "right" political party? What would protect a teacher from a rich, powerful parent who would insist their undeserving child receive an A? Finally, how could a teacher get a decent wage without a union to back them up?

The recent war on state workers shows that many people want to pay teachers next to nothing and expect them to provide superlative service.

American complacency and laziness are responsible for our school's problems. We love to point fingers - we're fat because fast food places serve cheeseburgers. If we get sick, it's the doctor's fault - let's take him to court. Never mind that we drink, smoke, overeat. Our philosophy seems to be: It Is Not Our Own Fault. Ever.

There will never be education reform until there is parent-student reform. If you want to prepare your child for the hard times ahead, put away the remote. Help your child make flashcards and drill them until they know the material. There is a nice, big building on Main Street called a library. It has books. You and your child could read and discuss them together. Make your kid study. That's the real reform.

2 Comments for "How to really reform American education "

  1. [quote]I've encountered maybe two teachers that I believed to be incompetent. Pretty good track record, I'd say.[/quote]
    What kind of track record exists for the kids who had these two incompetents for teachers? One incompetent teacher is too many. No (competent) principal would keep an incompetent teacher in a classroom, unless there was no choice.

    The more a teacher is worried about the health/strength of the union, the more incompetent s/he is as a teacher. The only thing a good teacher is worried about is being replaced by a union-backed incompetent colleague. Whereas, the incompetent teacher - without the protection of the union - needs to worry about being "outed" as incompetent every day.

    I think every parent would prefer "zero" incompetent teachers. Otherwise, every year you're telling 20 sets of parents,"yes, your child's teacher is incompetent, but s/he is only 1 of 2, so that's not too bad, right?"

    In short, good teachers don't need protection.

    [quote]how could a teacher get a decent wage without a union to back them up?[/quote]
    I guess it depends on how to define "decent wage". Now that (many of) the unions are out of the extortion business, we should hear plenty of stories about teachers on welfare, teachers standing in line at food banks, teachers turning to prostitution - right?

    Essentially, you're saying that every non-union worker in the country is accepting an "indecent" wage.

    lastpercentile Apr 18, 2012 1:24 PM

  2. Protectionism and money does not make for a better teacher.

    JustBecause Apr 29, 2012 1:07 PM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Upcoming Events

TWO SOCKS ON ONE NEEDLE

Location: Waupaca Community Arts Center - Waupaca

Fun in the Son

Location: St. John’s Church - New London

Cat Show

Location: gym, Faith Christian Academy - Wausau

Beer & Bon Bons fundraising event

Location: Lessons From the Art - Iola

Playgroup

Location: B.A.B.E.S. - New London