Sand mine has costs and consequences
I went to the town of Union board meeting on Aug. 20. Having grown up in Wisconsin, I saw and heard things that I never thought would happen.
I never thought that farmers would sell cropland for a sand mine that has been zoned heavy industrial in some sections of the state.
I never thought I'd see people turn a blind eye and deaf ear to their friends, neighbors and community.
These were people that, at one time, would come to their aid if a neighbor was in trouble.
They were people who shared their resources and saw themselves as stewards of the land.
Money makes people blind and in tough economic times I can understand the temptation.
But how can a few people be willing to put their neighbor's health at risk?
How can they be willing to risk the air being turned brown with silica sand dust that is known to cause life-threatening diseases of silicosis and lung cancer?
Silica sand clouds will, almost certainly, be breathed by everyone; every child, adult, bird and animal for up to 100 miles and along the truck route.
In a drought year like this one, how can a few people even think of allowing two high-capacity wells to be drilled for use in processing sand when the same groundwater is needed for drinking water for people, livestock and crop irrigation.
How can we allow a few people to benefit and risk contaminating the nearby wetland, Beaver Creek and Shaw Creek that feeds into the Little Wolf River?
Do we then sacrifice all the businesses that stand to suffer loss of income from fishing, hunting, camping and vacationing in this area?
How will we count the jobs lost when they will dwindle away slowly and never be counted into the equation because you can't prove the link to loss of the very character of Wisconsin that draws people here to be enjoyed?
We'll lose tax base from decreased property values, due to increased noise, dirty air, gone or contaminated water and truck traffic?
When we're told that state, counties and municipalities are struggling with budget shortfalls, how can we trade the higher property tax rate for the lower rate that a sand mine pays?
Does anyone realize that this is just kind of insane?
At the very least, why weren't the pleas from the people heeded to get a moratorium until independent experts could be called in to evaluate the legitimate concerns of the people?
If and when the county grants a conditional permit, the damage will be done in a matter of days.
There will be no recourse, it will be very difficult to rein this beast in, and people will realize that what they thought they were going to gain cost more than it was worth. A lot more.
This will cost us our way or life, our very core values - the values that can't be measured by dollars and cents, especially when the profit has been pocketed by a very few people.
We'll see our qualityof life go, hauled away first to the foundry and then to other states.
We will be left behind to ante up to repair damage, health care costs of Wisconsin's current citizens, their children or grandchildren and, in 50-100 years, the reclamation costs. All taxpayer funded.
- After a decade of delays, get it done
- Olsen owes voters an explanation
- Living under tyranny of federal government (3)
- In government, those with the most money win
- County ignores town of Union residents (2)
- Voucher deal is a Trojan horse
- County Q needs to be repaired (1)
- Sports have become our country's pacifier (2)
- Social Security Disability recipients on the rise (2)
- Preserving the state's stewardship program (1)